The Devil in the White City: Book Thoughts

The Devil in the White City is my favorite book by one of my favorite authors, and the topic of my first “Book Thoughts” post.  Author Erik Larson writes “narrative nonfiction,” meaning history that reads like a novel.  He picks amazing stories as topics, usually showing intertwined relationships between two or more threads and how, in detail, they develop together over time.  The Devil in the White City, on the surface is a story of the Chicago World’s Fair of 1893, a spectacular event that “recorded 27.5 million visits, this when the country’s total population was 65 million.”  It’s hard to image anything in modern times that rivals the Fair’s sheer scale and novelty.  At the fair, visitors “tasted a new snack called Cracker Jack and a new breakfast food called Shredded Wheat. Whole villages had been imported from Egypt, Algeria, Dahomey, and other far-flung locales, along with their inhabitants.”[1]  The Fair also originated other American traditions, such as an early version of the Pledge of Allegiance.

The Fair was also a contrast of two Chicagos: “The Black City to the north lay steeped in smoke and garbage, but here in the White City of the fair visitors found clean public bathrooms, pure water, an ambulance service, electric streetlights, and a sewage-processing system.”[2]  But behind the scenes of the Fair is a contrast of geniuses, and although Larson doesn’t appear to be a religious person, the book shows in this contrast that the gifts God has given you aren’t nearly as important as what you do with them.  While the book is about genius, the lesson could apply to any type of talent, echoing 1 Corinthians 13, where spiritual gifts are described as being useless if you have not love.

Burnham
For Chicago, the Fair was an opportunity to upstage New York and other major U.S. cities. It was the boasting of Chicagoans, “not the persistent southwesterly breeze, that had prompted New York editor Charles Anderson Dana to nickname Chicago ‘the Windy City.’”[3]  Once Chicago won the right to hold the fair, it needed a man to run it, “to build a railroad within the fairgrounds to transport steel, stone, and lumber to each construction site…to manage the delivery of supplies, goods, mail, and all exhibit articles sent to the grounds by transcontinental shipping companies…He would need a police force and a fire department, a hospital and an ambulance service. And there would be horses, thousands of them – something would have to be done about the tons of manure generated each day.”[4]

This man was Daniel Burnham, who may not be familiar to many now, but at the time he was rich enough that he “bought a barrel of fine Madeira and aged it by shipping it twice around the world on slow freighters.”[5]  Before the fair, he was an innovator in skyscraper construction and urban planning, and was highly motivated by rejections from Harvard and Yale earlier in life to prove that he was the “greatest architect in the city and country,” as he once wrote to his mother.  The book covers many stories of difficulties faced and overcome, by Burnham and his staff of thousands.

Holmes
In contrast to Burnham and his many brilliant architects and engineers was “Dr. H. H. Holmes”, a serial killer who set up near the fair, seducing visitors into his “Castle.”  Holmes saw his victims as mere “material” to be exploited, then disposed of, yet was able to cry at will and draw people – especially young women – with a gentle touch and piercing blue eyes.  Financed by an elaborate series of ruses and shell games, Holmes built his “Castle,” apparently a hotel and retail space that took up a full city block, but whose real purpose for Holmes was to lure, and process his “material.”  Inside were hidden passageways and rooms, gas chambers and bespoke crematory kilns.  Although appalling, Holmes’ achievements can only be described as genius, however put to nefarious uses.

Within this elaborate and expertly told story lies one more…

To “Out-Eiffel Eiffel”
Chicago’s Fair organizers knew that their Fair could only be a complete success if they included something as awesome as what was unveiled at the 1889 World’s Fair in Paris: “At the heart of the exposition stood a tower of iron that rose one thousand feet into the sky, higher by far than any man-made structure on earth. The tower…assured the eternal fame of its designer, Alexandre Gustave Eiffel.”

Therefore, “Something novel, original, daring and unique must be designed and built if American engineers are to retain their prestige and standing.”[6]  Chicago, and the country, “needed an opportunity to top the French, in particular to ‘out-Eiffel Eiffel.’”[7]  A formerly unknown engineer from Pittsburgh – although another genius – took this to heart, and the idea came to him “like an inspiration,” however it met much resistance from other engineers who said it could not be built, at least not safely.  This “complex assemblage of 100,000 parts…ranged in size from small bolts to the giant axle, which at the time of its manufacture by Bethlehem Steel was the largest one-piece casting ever made.”[8] Larson reveals what this structure was late in the book, and the way the story is told is one of many reasons The Devil in the White City is one of my favorite books.  Check it out, and remember, genius isn’t everything, but the gifts God has given you aren’t nearly as important as what you do with them.


[1] Larson, Erik. The Devil in the White City.  (2003).  P. 5
[2] P. 247
[3] P. 14
[4] P. 76
[5] P. 26
[6] P. 156
[7] P. 15
[8] P. 193

The Affair of the Sausages: History for March 9

The idea that the Protestant Reformation began with Martin Luther nailing the ninety-five theses to the door of All Saints’ Church in Wittenberg, Germany is fairly well known.  Less known is that the spark for Reformation in nearby Switzerland was a controversy over sausages.

March 9th was the first day of Lent in 1522, and Huldrych Zwingli, a pastor in Zurich, Switzerland, was the guest of printer Christoph Froschauer, who published some of Zwingli’s sermons and later his translation of the Bible into German.  Froschauer, working long hours with his staff, invited Zwingli to dinner on March 9th and served slices of smoked sausage to fortify everyone for the work ahead.  However, during Lent eating meat was illegal under the Catholic church-run government at the time, and Zwingli was arrested along with others at the dinner.

Photo by Rich Smith on Unsplash

Zwingli said he did not eat any sausage and so was spared the indignity of arrest, but the event was a turning point for him, and about one month later he preached a sermon titled “Freedom of Choice and Selection of Food” where he argued for freedom of conscience regarding observance of Lent.  The sum of the sermon was: “if you want to fast, do so; if you do not want to eat meat, don’t eat it; but allow Christians a free choice.”[1]

Zwingli, having previously been only loosely connected to Martin Luther and other Reformation figures and ideas, was appalled by the prioritization of state and priestly authority over the authority of God in each person’s heart:

“If you would be a Christian at heart, act in this way. If the spirit of your belief teaches you thus, then fast, but grant also your neighbor the privilege of Christian liberty, and fear God greatly, if you have transgressed his laws, nor make what man has invented greater before God than what God himself has commanded…You should neither scorn nor approve anyone for any reason connected with food or with feast days whether observed or not.”

Also in the sermon, Zwingli emphasizes the “why” a Christian does what he does over the “what”:

“Here is another sign of the times. I think that there is danger of this age being evil and corrupt rather than reaching out towards everlasting righteousness. Further, simple people think everything is all right if they go to confession in Lent only, observe the fast, take Communion and thus account for the whole year. God should, however, be acknowledged at all times and our life should be one of piety, whereas we act to the contrary when we think that it is quite enough if we pay attention only to the times of fasting whereas Christ says, ‘Be vigilant: for you know not the day or the hour’”

In an earlier post on Lent, I wrote that whatever our liturgy, it is useless as a “bargaining chip” with God, and that “if we do not value the prize – God Himself – nothing we give up for Lent will make us – or God Himself – happy.”  Zwingli became a forceful voice during the Reformation arguing that external pressure from church and state can strip us of grace and enslave us to legalism, but he also recognized with Paul that “Every athlete exercises self-control in all things[2]  Self-control cannot be forced by others, but in search of an “imperishable” prize, each should prayerfully consider the disciplines that help them better serve God, in accordance with His word, while showing grace towards others who God may ask to behave differently.  Not all athletes compete in the same events and train the same way.

Closing Note
I once considered naming this blog “Lenten Sausages” after the events described above, but that might have defined the blog as what it’s against.  Instead, the current name emphasizes the common destiny of all for whom Christ was crucified.  Every Christian became one because of Christ.  Before there were Protestants there were Christians.  Many of them.  After there were Protestants there are Catholic believers and Protestant nonbelievers, and vice versa.  One man’s liturgy is sometimes another man’s legalism.  Regardless of what’s on the sign in front of your church, it’s what’s inside that matters.

Soli Deo Gloria


[1] Zwingli, Huldrych.  “Freedom of Choice and Selection of Food.”  (1522)
[2] 1 Corinthians 9:25

Jesus is Patient and Kind Even When I am Not

Jesus is patient and kind; Jesus does not envy or boast; Jesus is not arrogant or rude. Jesus does not insist on His own way; He is not irritable or resentful; He does not rejoice at wrongdoing, but rejoices with the truth. Jesus bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things.

Knowing the love Jesus has for us is an encouraging thought. This paraphrase of 1 Corinthians 13:4-8 was suggested in a devotional I read in 2021 [1] for John 13:34 – “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another.”  James Boice said that we are not to “love” in any way we see fit, but as Jesus loved, which the above describes.

Based on John 13:34, Boice says we should be able to substitute “I” in place of “Jesus” and see what He commands us to be.  When I re-read the first paragraph with myself in mind, I see how much I fall short, but His love for me remains an encouragement.  He will be patient and kind with me.

Pray that we may get ever closer to living the love of Jesus.


[1] From “August 30.” James Montgomery Boice and Marion Clark. Come to the Waters: Daily Bible Devotions for Spiritual Refreshment.  (2017).

Listening & Understanding: A Quint of Quotes

Fellow travelers,

Here is another “Quint of Quotes” from my collection.  I hope you find these five somewhat related sayings interesting and thought-provoking.

Photo by Paule Knete on Unsplash

“Very few people would listen if they didn’t know it was their turn next.” – Robert Conklin, Entrepreneur, Motivational Speaker (1921 – 1998)

“Checking the truth of something should come well before getting agitated about it” – Prof. John Staddon of Duke University

“He who knows only his own side of the case, knows little of that” – John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873)

“I have often repented of having spoken, but never of having kept silent.” – Saint Arsenius the Deacon (350 – 445 A.D.)

A fool takes no pleasure in understanding,            but only in expressing his opinion.” – Proverbs 18:2

In Pursuit of Fruit

What fruitful habits do you have for spending time with God?  Are there personal patterns in your relationship with Him through prayer, Bible study or other means?  Note that I write “fruitful” instead of “enjoyable” because although we’d like to enjoy every moment with God, as our Father He sometimes has to tell us things we won’t like immediately.  As Jesus said in John 15:2 – “Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit.”

One example of a fruitful habit for me has been to study more than one book of the Bible at a time.  What do I mean by this?  For example, I currently have a goal to read 1-2 chapters each of the Psalms and the Pentateuch[1] daily, along with study Bible notes.  The idea came from a recent sermon, where the 5 books of Psalms were described as similar in theme to the 5 books of the Pentateuch.  Shortly after, I read that: “Just as Genesis tells how mankind was created, fell into sin, and was then promised redemption, many of these psalms [book 1, or Psalms 1-41] discuss humans as blessed, fallen, and redeemed by God.”[2]  With a little work, I was able to map out a schedule lining up the Psalm readings with the other readings and I’m trying to follow it.  Reading different parts together can help make connections I wouldn’t otherwise.  One connection recently led me to post about frustration with my cat and how it relates to Noah and the ark.

At other times, I’ve been reading a Gospel along with the Psalms, or one of the prophets because changing the pattern over time helps reveal unexpected context or connections.  I wouldn’t talk to a friend the same way over and over again, so why do it with God?  Years ago, when reading Psalm 46:10 and Matthew 21:15-16 on the same day led to a stark reminder that God is worthy of, and will receive, all praise.  These are those verses that nailed the point home:

Be still, and know that I am God.
            I will be exalted among the nations,
            I will be exalted in the earth!”

But when the chief priests and the scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying out in the temple, “Hosanna to the Son of David!” they were indignant, and they said to him, “Do you hear what these are saying?” And Jesus said to them, “Yes; have you never read,
             “‘Out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies
                        you have prepared praise’?”

I know I can’t require God to speak to me in a certain way, but these occasional “accidents” from different parts of Scripture have reinforced each other in ways I might have never seen or might even have resisted.  Sometimes, we might prefer to keep certain truths away from certain parts of our lives, but when we make time to be quiet, listen and allow different parts of God’s word to collide in ways we didn’t expect, we may uncover an encouragement or a challenge that bears fruit.

What creative and fruitful habits do you have for spending time with God?


[1] The first five books of the Bible, sometimes called the books of Moses (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy)
[2] Life Application Study Bible, introduction to the Psalms.