Sodom and Gomorrah’s Selfishness

Fellow travelers,

The story of Sodom and Gomorrah from the book of Genesis is well-known even to many who aren’t religious.  Genesis 18 and 19 describe the two cities as extremely wicked, specifically mentioning homosexuality and rape.  The English term “sodomy” even comes from the name of the city of Sodom.  In the Genesis story, Lot and some of his family escape based on Abraham pleading with God for them, “Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the LORD out of heaven.  And he overthrew those cities, and all the valley, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground.”  (Genesis 19:24-25).  This is the most well-known part of the story, and some explanations of why the cities were destroyed found on the internet and elsewhere say Genesis has the “full account” of the story.  Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for their excessive sexual sins.

However, there is more.

Ezekiel, a prophet to Jews captive in Babylon centuries after Sodom was destroyed, said: “Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy.  They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it.”  (Ezekiel 16:49-50). Ezekiel was describing the sins of Judah to explain why they had been sent into exile from their Promised Land and said they don’t compare favorably even to Sodom.  Surprisingly, Ezekiel doesn’t even mention any sexual sins in this description.  Not that these sins were irrelevant, but in Ezekiel’s view, Sodom would have been destroyed even without them.  Sodom’s other sins were also abominations.

What’s the point?  I can’t say it any better than the Life Application Study Bible, which notes on Ezekiel 16:49: “Sodom was destroyed because of its pride, laziness, gluttony, and unconcern for the poor and needy. It is easy to be selective in what we consider gross sin. If we do not commit such horrible sins as adultery, homosexuality, stealing, and murder, we may think we are living good enough lives.”

We can’t pick and choose which sins are more or less deserving of God’s judgement, because in His holiness and justice, He must and will judge all sin.  While “lifestyle” sins without repentance may be more dangerous to a church or congregation, even sins we may not consider extreme are dangerous as well.  Ezekiel’s point is that selfishness and a disregard for those in need should be repented of as much as any other sin.  Ezekiel wrote, “Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy.  They were haughty and did an abomination before me. So I removed them, when I saw it,” but he also wrote that Judah would be restored by a coming Messiah, the Christ.

That restoration comes through Christ’s sacrifice for all sins, and anyone can have salvation through faith, which drives us to confession and repentance.  As John wrote in 1 John 1:8-10, “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.  If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.  If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.”

At the end of our journey, all of God’s people will be cleansed of all of their sins, not just the most noticeable ones, because “he is faithful.”  Not because any of us are less sinful than others.

Bride of the High Priest

Being an Old Testament priest was a demanding profession, full of rules and restrictions about what you must do and what you couldn’t do.  For the one high priest, it was even more challenging.  Within the first 5 books of our Bible (also called the Pentateuch, or the books of Moses) there are long lists of rules for these people to follow that didn’t apply to anyone else.  And sometimes with these rules we find interesting pictures of Jesus, our High Priest.  Today I’m writing about one example of that.

In Leviticus 21:13-15, God tells Moses, and then to the people through Moses, about who a high priest may marry:

“And he shall take a wife in her virginity.  A widow, or a divorced woman, or a woman who has been defiled, or a prostitute, these he shall not marry. But he shall take as his wife a virgin of his own people, that he may not profane his offspring among his people, for I am the LORD who sanctifies him.”

These verses would be good advice for most people, but for high priests these things are required[1].  The point is to keep the high priest, and those closest to him, as holy and dedicated to God as possible.  Because the high priesthood was an inherited role, “he may not profane his offspring among his people.”  There was to be no question that this man’s children were not defiled in any way.

Today, we no longer have a high priest serving in the temple in Jerusalem for us, but what we do have is Jesus as our High Priest[2].  If He is our High Priest, do regulations about marriage have anything to do with Him?  How do these Levitical rules apply to who Jesus chooses to marry, since He didn’t marry while He was on earth?  These rules matter because in the New Testament, most notably in Revelation, the Christian church is the bride of Jesus Christ.  The church is who He decided to marry.

But, in light of Leviticus 21, how does our High Priest Jesus “marry” his church without being defiled?  None of us are spiritual “virgins.”  Instead, we are a church full of sinners who wed themselves to dead gods, separating ourselves from the true God, and defiling ourselves in worship of other gods.  Spiritually, we are prostitutes committing spiritual adultery with all the things we choose to worship that are not God.

So, how does Jesus follow the Levitical regulation to “take as his wife a virgin of his own people”?

The answer is that He sanctifies His people by His blood.  In the Old Testament we are shown pictures of this concept.  In David’s famous penitential prayer of Psalm 51, he asks God to “Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean; wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.” (verse 7).  In Isaiah, God says to His people:

“Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD:
             though your sins are like scarlet,
                        they shall be as white as snow;
             though they are red like crimson,
                        they shall become like wool.” (verse 18)

Back in verse 15 of Leviticus 21, God said: “I am the Lord who sanctifies him.”  Through the shedding of His blood, His death, and His resurrection, we are made as clean from our sin and idolatrous, adulterous worship as we could ever be.  We are made “white as snow”.  We are made to be acceptable in the eyes of a holy and just God.  We are made to be a suitable bride for Jesus Christ, we become “a virgin of his own people,” with no trace of the times we rebelled against our one, true God.  He is the one who sanctifies us.

In this rule that is seemingly irrelevant to modern Christians, there is a picture of the sacrifice of our Lord, and of the way He views His people.  If we were not sanctified, He could not “marry” us.  Do you believe that Jesus sees you as “white as snow”?  The Bible says that His people are, otherwise, they would not be acceptable to Him.  But we are sanctified if we accept Christ’s work on our behalf.

Pray for God to reassure us of this truth today!  Pray for Him to wash away all of our guilt and shame.  Pray that we would know that we, in spite of ourselves, are accepted because of what He’s done for us.

Amen.


[1] Because the Aaronic priesthood was hereditary, celibacy was not required, or even recommended. Marriage and procreation were encouraged, or the line would not continue.
[2] Hebrews 3:1, 4:14, 6:20

The Rebellion at Babel

The story of the Tower of Babel, recorded in just 9 verses in Genesis 11, has a lot more to say than its length might suggest.  It’s not just the story of a tower being built, or a story about the origin of different languages.  It is also a story of why the tower was built and what it meant about the builders’ relationship with God.

The Tower of Babel was mankind’s best effort at achieving salvation, a path to heaven, based on their own works.  In the tower we see man declaring his independence from God, his lack of need for the God, or any god.  This act of rebellion was similar to Adam and Eve’s sinful desire to know good and evil for themselves in the garden of Eden, because the builders of the tower were saying that they know better than God.  “We’ll get to perfection on our own,” they thought.  They were the progressives of their day, believing in the infinite potential of mankind.

Also, verse 4 tells us that part of the motivation for building the tower was to prevent man from being “dispersed over the face of the whole earth,” but God had told His people to “fill the earth,”[1] not to settle down in one spot.  In the next chapter God would tell Abraham that he would become a nation, and that through that nation, “all the families of the earth shall be blessed.”[2]  God’s people are not meant to hide in their own dwellings, but to bless the world by telling it of God’s love and by living out that love to “all the families of the earth.”  Babel’s builders had the wrong priorities.

Photo by Simon Berger on Unsplash. The Tower of Babel may have been a ziggurat or a pyramid.

The story of the Tower also tells us that our best efforts will always fall short.  In the story, note that “the LORD came down to see the city and the tower.”  Mankind intended for this tower to reach heaven, but God had to “come down” to see it.  Our best efforts fall way below God’s standards and intention for us.  While we might achieve a lot and take pride in it, it’s never as good as what God can do for us, and we know that “God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.”[3]  Later in history, He would show us that only He, in Christ Jesus, could be the path that gets us to heaven.  There is no other way no matter how hard we try.

Another subtle point from the story is that the materials we decide to work with are never better than what God has already given us.  Babel’s builders “had brick for stone,” meaning the tower was built with manmade bricks, not stones.  We might think of stones as “natural” but really, they’re what God created in the form He created it, and they’re much stronger than bricks.  In the same way, if we follow God’s intention for our lives rather than inventing our own ways, we will find that His ways are better and stronger than anything else available.

Lastly, the tower’s very name, Babel, is a form of “Babylon,” which is a literal city, but also in Revelation 17-18 Babylon represents any society where man attempts to live independently of God.  To seek perfection without Him and by His righteousness.  Revelation also tells us that Babylon will be destroyed, and everything that Babylon represents.

God has given us everything we need to live and to glorify Him today.  Will we use it, or try to go our own way?


[1] Genesis 1:28, Genesis 9:1
[2] Genesis 12:3
[3] James 4:6, 1 Peter 5:5

Caught in the Act

The beginning of John chapter 8 has quite an enigmatic and controversial story about a woman caught in adultery.  The basics of the story are: Jesus was teaching in the temple in Jerusalem, and some Pharisees brought Him a woman they caught in the act of committing adultery.  They asked Jesus whether they should stone her, and the first thing Jesus does is write something on the ground with His finger (the only recorded instance of Jesus writing I believe).  Then Jesus stands and says, “Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.”[1]  Then He goes back to writing on the ground, and the woman’s accusers end up walking away.  Jesus then tells the woman He does not condemn her, but that she should “sin no more.”[2]

One problem with the story is that it is not included in the earliest manuscripts of John’s gospel, and so it’s questionable whether it should be in the Bible at all.  Another part of the story commentators talk about is what Jesus was writing on the ground.  From what John (or someone else) wrote, we don’t know.  We can only suspect that what was written had something to do with why the accusers went away.

I don’t like to speculate on what Scripture left out, especially on verses that may not even be inspired, but if this story actually happened, I do have my own guess at what Jesus wrote.  He probably wrote more than one thing, but part of what He wrote may have been “where is the man?”

See, Old Testament law said that both parties in the adultery (it always takes 2 people to commit adultery) should be stoned (see Leviticus 20:10 and Deuteronomy 22:22).  If these Pharisees truly caught the woman in the act, the man must have been present at the time or she wasn’t “in the act”.  Why wasn’t he being brought before Jesus?  We know the Pharisees were desperate to catch Jesus saying something wrong, so maybe, perhaps[3], the “guilty” man was in conspiracy with the Pharisees to embarrass Jesus?  In a male-dominated society, did the Pharisees think it was ok for the man to get away with it, especially if it led to a situation where the Pharisees could make Jesus look bad?  They may have been tired of losing arguments with Him.

In this situation, if Jesus wrote “where is the man?” on the ground it would let the Pharisees know that He was on to their scheme and knew they were being hypocritical.  Jesus always knows.

My handy dandy study Bibles warn not to make doctrine from this story that may not have actually happened, but I think there’s a lesson to be learned anyway, and it is that every one of us is “caught in the act” by Jesus.  Jesus knew that, under the law, both the woman that the Pharisees brought forward, and the unseen man were both guilty of adultery.  Likewise, whether our own sins are brought to public attention or whether they happen in secret, Jesus knows about them.  Also, not all of our sins are physical.  Some may be spiritual, where we put something else in the place of God in our hearts and minds.  Nothing escapes His notice.  Knowing this should terrify us, except…

I read a devotional by James Boice where he said that the person we want to be in this story is the woman caught in the act of adultery.  Why?  Because although her sins were revealed, she was forgiven and was alone left standing with Jesus when everyone else went away.  We may be too proud to admit we belong in her place, but maybe that’s because we aren’t aware enough of our won sins.  See, from Jesus’ perspective we are all “caught in the act.”  Not just once or twice, but many times over.  We may not be physical adulterers, but we are all spiritual adulterers.  Therefore, we need His grace and mercy, which He freely grants.  The cross paid for all our sins.

However, the story also teaches that grace is not license.  Christ died that He may give us grace and we must not scorn His sacrifice.  This woman’s forgiveness was free for her, but not for Him.  Our forgiveness is free to us, but not for Him.  It required the ultimate sacrifice, but He was willing and able to make it.

Jesus may have done a “gotcha” with the hypocritical Pharisees, and 1 John 1:10 says “If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us,” but the verse right before that says “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”  As long as we admit our guilt (which He already knows about), the grace He makes available to us is endless and eternal.

“Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.” – Hebrews 4:16


[1] John 8:7
[2] John 8:11
[3] Maybe and perhaps are two words I hate to use when referring to Scripture, but maybe, perhaps, today is an exception.

Separating Good and Evil

I like to collect quotes, and I have many favorites, but (outside of the Bible) the most influential quote to me is this one from Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:

“The line separating good and evil passes, not through states, not between political parties either, but right through all human hearts.”

Much of the conflict in history, and in modern times, comes from a human tendency to group people into separate groups, where one is “evil”, and the other is “good.”  There are probably thousands of examples throughout history, but some that come to mind are religious categories like Catholic versus Protestant, political categories like Republican versus Democrat, or Marxist categories like “oppressed” versus “oppressor.”  Humanity follows a pattern over and over again, where we lump people into categories, then attack our enemies accordingly.  If someone belongs to the “other” group, they are evil, and if someone belongs to our own group, they are good.

In opposition to this, the Solzhenitsyn quote calls to attention Romans 3:23, which declares: “for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”  This verse, and the quote, tear down the idea that people can be easily separated into “good” and “evil.”  That nations can be divided into good and evil.  That political parties can be categorized as good and evil.  Because every single person included in every single one of these categories is themselves a mix of good and evil, each of the groups themselves is a mix of good and evil.

Therefore, the quote calls us to treat people as individuals, dealing with them according to their specific situation and needs.  Without accepting that each person is imperfect (at best), societies may pretend to treat people as individuals, but they’re really stereotyping people according to their groups and pitting them in battle against each other.

For the Christian church, the quote doesn’t demand that we withdraw from politics altogether, but it does demand that we act with more compassion toward those we disagree with.  All too often, and especially on social media, we see category-based name calling and condemnation coming from Christians who categorize people and work hard to defeat those enemies that belong to other groups.

However, Jesus said in Matthew 5:43:
“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’  But I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”

Imagine if we followed Jesus’ words.  Imagine if everyone could be humble based on the evil that lives within them, and therefore treat the people who we view as evil as equals before God, and just as in need of grace as we are.  The church, and the world, would be much better off if Christians were as good at loving their enemies as they are at identifying them.

“The line separating good and evil passes, not through states, not between political parties either, but right through all human hearts.”